Previous Entry | Next Entry

Heroes - before I lose the thought

  • May. 4th, 2007 at 8:31 AM
naanima: ([Misc] Don't forget)
So, I have seen about 11 episodes of Heroes, and there are some truly awesome bits to the series - good plot, nice effects and of course HIRO and ANDO! But you know, I just can't get into the series, and I remember commenting to someone awhile back that the portrayal of certain female characters on the show makes me highly uncomfortable. Thinking about it I do believe that is one of the major issues I have with the series - I can't articulate it well enough, all I know is that whenever I think of the female characters on Heroes I think of women who inevitably gets sexualised in one way or another. Honestly, think of all female characters on Heroes, would you want any of them to be a female role model?

As for the race issue on Heroes - I don't even want to think about it, because Hiro and Ando's characterisation are awesome, but Mohinder makes me wince. So, um, overall - the show is something I'd watch if it is there but I'd not keep nor follow.

Comments

[identity profile] nekomancy.livejournal.com wrote:
May. 5th, 2007 05:41 pm (UTC)
I understand your detachment from this series, but some people have gotten more "involved" further along. It takes a very long time to like the characters (other than Hiro), but the mystery of what happens does hook you... to a point.

- Mohinder -
The problem I find with the character is that the Western educated stereotype it simply portrays without a proper language background. The character sprouts "East vs West" type jargon without proper context.

For a Western educated individual, his logic/reasoning and problem solving skills are below the norm stereotype. Especially in view of the fact that he's suppose to be a "teaching professor".

I think basicly his too 2-dimensional and does not wise-up enough throughout the first 17 eps.

- Inter-racial couples -
On this issue, I think the fact that there is no commentary is not necessarily positive. Visual evidence of these relationships are more compelling. For example, Nikki+D.L. = bad relationship / stereotype criminals; Isaac+Simone = he's a racial minority (Jewish?) but is an artist, therefore does drugs. Relationship doesn't work out, she bails on him, he shoots her (accidentally); Peter+Simone = American values, she sleeps with him, get dead; Eden+Mohinder (doesn't really count) but she dies, just as her emotional attachment forms for a non-caucasian individual; Hiro+Charlie - she dies... see prev;

But this could be reading far too much into gender relations.

- Role Model Women -
I agree with [livejournal.com profile] naanima that there really isn't a real role model here. Classic/cheesey/co(s)mic one-liners, scenes and dialogue, yes. Real role model, no. The females are highly sexualized in this series.

Claire's lack of solid grounding makes her a more "real" character than others, but she is not exactly who we want today's teens to grow into. Cheerleader - hello?

Nikki's bi-polar MPD psycho, so not her. Kinky bitch Jessica-persona + innocent I can't do anything-Nikki are both visually presented as sex symbols.

Simone's lack of open-mindedness/participation and lack of screen time leaves her out of the running.

Janice Parkman - Matt's wife, adulteress. Hmm, not a contender.

Heidi Petrelli - not enough of her to show if she merits role model-ship.

Audrey Hasson - too close minded, dispassionate, no reasoning capabilities and huge trust issues.

Profile

naanima: (Default)
[personal profile] naanima
witty, somehow

Latest Month

October 2009
S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Designed by [personal profile] chasethestars