Previous Entry | Next Entry

Comments

[identity profile] worldserpent.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2005 05:38 pm (UTC)
? what wank are you referring to?
[identity profile] naanima.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2005 11:52 pm (UTC)
Beyond the current 'should readers critique' and , which lead to the banning of the reader on her lj. I think it is the timing of reading something like this and the general discussion about critique of fanfiction (which I'm of two minds, because by nature I'm all about critiquing a piece of literature no matter whether the author wants it or not). Fandom-osmosis working over time.

The whole thing just doesn't sit well with me. I'm finding myself, hmm, questioning my respect for certain people (both writers and readers.) I know I get highly passionate (down-right rabid) about certain issues, but the way things have being paying out (people's reactions) are kind of hard to cope with.

*sighs* And this is why I sit and watch, getting involved in fandom is really quite draining.
(http://www.livejournal.com/users/guede_mazaka/437624.html?thread=6596216#t6596216)
[identity profile] worldserpent.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 25th, 2005 12:41 am (UTC)
This debate frustrates me because the comm isn't trying to do intellectually respectable criticism. I mean, it's *not* trying to be scholarly, so I think it falls down to say that it's doomed to fail to be scholarly. On the other hand, this was coming because of the nature of fandom and the fact that all parties simply cannot get what they all want.

(Witness the debate on concrit. People who want concrit benefit tremendously by making it the social standard; in that they glorify concrit and make it the thing that all writers want, and then people automatically work hard to leave concrit as a thank you note to the writers. Now, most people, I suspect, really find concrit a chore, and really do it solely to show their appreciation. In other words, they don't do it at all, or very little, for themselves, and they don't get much public recognition for it, especially when it's in email and not public at all. This is not the way many other fandom activities work. That's why it's so much uphill work to get them to do it. Because they're not doing it for themselves, they totally fail and waste their time if the recipient doesn't appreciate the concrit, and thus a lot of encouragement is needed.)
[identity profile] naanima.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 25th, 2005 01:06 am (UTC)
Which shouldn't come as a surprise. I have been having conversations with the boy-friend about the nature of fandom (to be specific the nature of yaoi-fandom that sees m/m in shows such as 'Samurai Champloo,' which makes slightly irritated because he cannot see anything of the sort. The conclusion, we agreed to disagree,) and it really should be obvious that fandom is a diverse culture because people are different. What's worse is that we all take everything way too seriosuly *sighs*

(What irritate me about the whole discussion is not the fact that authors are expressing a view about the perception and treatment of their own work. What irritate me is that there appear to be a double standard now. So, if the author does not want my honest opinion, I should not comment? There are numerous works out there that I adore but I'm not blind to their faults, am I suppose to harp on about their wonderfulness but not comment on what I thought was not wonderful about their work? Many a-author ask, often rabidly, for feedback, c&c they say, and when an honest opinion is given they sees it as an attack on their work. I'm trying to put my thoughts/feelings into words. I suppose what I'm trying to say is that if they are not happy with the one-line SQUUE as a comment than maybe they shouldn't complain when they don't get comments. And this is probably another topic, but I honestly do feel as if the line between honest, thoughful opinion and rabid attack is becoming more and more murky. So, instead of c&c please, are we going to be getting something like 'dnc' (do not critique). I just don't know. *frustrated*)
[identity profile] worldserpent.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 25th, 2005 01:23 am (UTC)
Just tell him it's *fandom,* it mostly *makes no sense.* And that you can never really understand pr0n you don't go for. :D

No, I think writers should be perfectly free to disagree violently and at length at the substance of the criticisms or comments. They should feel perfectly free to say that the reader's interpretation is wrong.

I agree that dnc is helpful. Stops people from wasting their time as well. True, what most writers really want is glowing praise/recs, but what are writers really entitled to? Is it reasonable for them to expect that? These are two different things, I feel. The whole situation in truth interests me as one of whether compromise can be achieved. How can you deal with people who angrily demand that one liners be ceased, when you have others complaining that squee is just fine? Then you have others bitterly ranting that they receive none, others complaining that the concrit was insufficiently constructive, and even some people complaining about being recced where they couldn't see, even when comments were uniformly positive.
[identity profile] naanima.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 25th, 2005 02:45 am (UTC)
Ok. Lj is being evil. It keep on cutting off the second half of my comments. If this doens't work. I'm emailing you.

Oh trust me, that's pretty much how it ended (with the gnashing of teeths of course.)

That's perfectly fine, but to ban someone from your lj because they pointed out a small error? I mean, that's just pushing it. Mind you, I have always operated under the 'don't agree, don't comment.' (Unless I know them well enough that they won't get irritated if I point out certain errors)

I'd ABSOLUTELY love a dnc, makes me feel less guilty when I don't comment on their fics.

And here we get to the crux of the issue: Compromise is needed, but the problem is no one knows where that line is. Like you said different authors want different things, I, personally, woud like someone to crtic my writings (if I ever write anything), to point out my mistakes so I don't feel like a complete fool if I ever published on a bigger play ground than my lj. Not saying I don't like praise, but I'm looking more to perfecting/bettering myself than getting praise for what I already know I'm good at. Either way, it is a frustrating issue, because I keep on hearing what the writer is entitled too, but what about the reader?
[identity profile] worldserpent.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 25th, 2005 07:49 am (UTC)
People just need to be cured of the delusion that fandom is generally about anything useful or productive. XD

I agree, but this is exactly why I don't bother to comment either. Never mind the banning, what about the wasted effort? It's kind of amorphous in the fic what exactly these errors are; don't know much about the fandom, but the "whomever who blahb lbah" sentence looked wrong to me, and I can't put my finger on it exactly, but it did look like there were a lot of things that had the feel of sloppiness rather than artistic license.

Yeah, there is no line. Usually it's only the writers who care to post rants, so this leads to a buildup of frustration and a revanchist effort, followed by... well, you know the story. The problem with every compromise is that it will suit the majority of people, but the vocal minorities on both ends will nearly always be upset, and continue to be so. And of course it isn't fully a democratic thing, because the squeaky wheels get the grease, and yet at the same time people vote with their feet.
[identity profile] naanima.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 29th, 2005 02:46 am (UTC)
It is true though XD.

Exactly, I have taken in the warning signs, and will only reply to people that want me too. It is a case of taking things way too personally, and well, if you can't the critique as constructive criticism than maybe you should only write to people who will only praise you. *sighs* People are strange.

Democracy is one of those philosophies that sounds wonderful in theory, but seriously, there is not such thing as freedom for all, blah, blah. Either way fandom is like a political system on itself.

[identity profile] worldserpent.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 30th, 2005 05:53 pm (UTC)
Or even as unconstructive criticism. I suppose people are upset because readers not getting the piece does sometimes indicate a kind of failure, but geez, as we can see from fandom, even the pros get misread and it's often more about the reader. (What I don't get about this debate is that fandom is a radical (sometimes *too radical* for my tastes) privileging of the reader... surely one must certainly *expect* exactly this of such readers!)
[identity profile] naanima.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 31st, 2005 03:57 am (UTC)
Mixed signals makes me experience much headache. I can see why the writer would be irritated by the reader not understanding the Deep and Meaningful of a piece, but geez, just be glad the 'stupid' reader are willing to comment on your fic no matter how stupid (flames are different). Exactly, it is nothing new, everyone (or they should) who gets invoved in fandom should know the pitfuls of writing for a highly consumer-directed audience ('more! MORE! MORE! NOW! NOW!). I'm not sure about the 'radical' nature of the reader, I'm not doubting they exsit, it is just I'm beginning to question if authors (fanfic) are too 'radical' as well.
[identity profile] worldserpent.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 31st, 2005 05:11 am (UTC)
I mean, if the fic is *truly* deep n' meaningful, shouldn't it be a given that the majority are not going to get it anyway, considering what the baseline is? If you take the people who are writing and considering those who are reading probably have even less skill, what can one expect?

I guess the wheel keeps turning round and round... but we never get anywhere. XD Kristi probably has the best handle on the situation. (In other words, 'why are we having this discussion again?' is as good a response as any)

I guess I think when you yourself are a 'radical' reader, you shouldn't be surprised when you get them?
[identity profile] naanima.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 31st, 2005 11:47 pm (UTC)
Exactly. It is not a secret that the vocal-majority of the fandom are young, or just not interested in the deep and meaningful (it is all about the pron my friend).

I think that's a great way of looking at it. Will stop talking about this after this comment (maybe). And will spend my time reading fics and NOT commenting.

I prefer the term 'open-minded' ;p
[identity profile] worldserpent.livejournal.com wrote:
Sep. 1st, 2005 05:38 pm (UTC)
People never get tired of it because they have substantial benefit from changing or keeping the status quo, socially. Even people who write rants about how no one is entitled to anything feel obliged to tell people to comment, which makes me laugh.

True. Ph33r the open-minded reader. XD

Profile

naanima: (Default)
[personal profile] naanima
witty, somehow

Latest Month

October 2009
S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Designed by [personal profile] chasethestars