Previous Entry | Next Entry

Apparently we have equal opportunities now.

  • Apr. 23rd, 2008 at 9:26 AM
naanima: ([Misc] I'm a cunt)
So, some guy talked about asking to touch Women's Boobs, and right off I can think of the arguments for it.

1. He asked first.
2. She can say no.
3. She didn’t say no.
4. We only want to touch nice boobs.

My reaction - sure, you can touch my boobs, if I can cut your dick off first.

I love how it is all about the MAN PAIN, and that OH NOES! I was so horribly scarred in high school, blah, blah, blah sob story. Do not speak to me about your emotional trauma if you have never been viewed as a piece of meat with no higher brain functions but for your breast and your vagina. So, fuck you and your ‘movement’, if I ever meet you in person I will kick you in the nuts.

I'm a woman, I live with the background thought that I can be attacked at any time because I am woman, because apparently being a woman means it is OK to be harassed in a sexual manner.

If you cannot see what is wrong with asking a woman whether you can touch her boobs then I really don't want to talk to you or know you. Please de-friend me it would make you and I feel much better.

ETA: Open Source Swift Kick to the Balls Project - YAY!

Comments

[identity profile] blondeleo.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 02:01 am (UTC)
wow. just.... wow.
[identity profile] naanima.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 02:50 am (UTC)
Humanity.

Right.
[identity profile] ifyouweremine.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 02:45 am (UTC)
The Open Source Swift Kick to the Balls Project (http://misia.livejournal.com/1055120.html)
[identity profile] naanima.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 02:50 am (UTC)
This makes me feel much better.

Thank you.
[identity profile] ifyouweremine.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 03:00 am (UTC)
<3333 #hugs#

Yes, it was a nice break from the retardedness of the original post.
archangelbeth: An egyptian-inspired eye, centered between feathered wings. (Default)
[personal profile] archangelbeth wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 03:52 am (UTC)
In all fairness, the context that it came up in wasn't Random Strangers, but a SF convention, among people who knew each other (mostly), and who had full opt-in "if you're not wearing an "ask me" button, you don't get asked" as the plan.

Plus, the guy edited that post to mention:
And the chances that the Project would get fucked up, making con spaces more amenable to hordes of stalkers and mouthbreathers who will grope and maul women, are pretty damn big. Hell, it’s already made women feel less safe by me mentioning it, and that makes me feel like shit. As it should.

The Project itself, at least as done at Penguicon, has been turned by the miracle of reposting into some nightmare of eternal groping, female hunting, and a constant stream of denigration. And while that’s [...] not what happened at all [...t]hat easily could happen without proper supervision, male power being what it is… [...] If I’ve contributed to the idea that women are not safe, then I’ve failed with a capital “F,” regardless of the underlying reality. And if people think that all cons are filled with horrific swarms of gropers, well, then I’ve also failed.



So, as the guy's learned... What goes over among friends in fandom isn't going to fly in the general mundania. What would make me say, "no, spousal access only" at a con (and only be somewhat weirded; I attend a con that's big on exhibitionism and asking permission) is, "You back off NOW or the cops are being called" in any other circumstances.

I hope that me seeing the nuances doesn't fall into the category of "stop reading journal now." O:(
[identity profile] naanima.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 05:14 am (UTC)
See, the beginning of the original post was even slightly amusing, except the more it progressed the worse it got. I just wish he had thought out the whole thing a bit more clearly before posting it up under the title of 'Open Source' anything. The implication of it was really bad.

It always comes back to how people phrase things, and I just - *hand gestures* it could have been done so much better. The whole thing could have been something I would have laughed at if only the language for the original post wasn't so wrong.

So, no, definitely not, someone with a clearer head is always appreciated, and context is always important to an argument. But even with context the way the post was written just crossed a few lines. I think what truly pushed me over the edge was the comments. And while I admire the guy for seeing the errors of his way, it really does put a downer on me that a post like this was posted in such a way in the first place.

I just, you know, some days I hope to god that when I do have children I won’t be having girls.
archangelbeth: An egyptian-inspired eye, centered between feathered wings. (Default)
[personal profile] archangelbeth wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 03:05 am (UTC)
I totally agree with you -- it wasn't a good idea to try to expand it out, though... See, here, lemme link over to an entirely unrelated journal: [livejournal.com profile] ozarque. She does communication stuff (to understate), and a while back she had a series of posts on what evolved into two types of communication strategies: Ask and Hint cultures. A Hint culture won't come right out and say... just about anything, really. They give clues, hints, and oblique code phrases (that are clear as day to most people who've grown up and either been deliberately told the rules, or are just good at picking it up).

And then there's the Ask types, who are oblivious to hints, clues, etc., and want to be told things flat-out or asked things flat-out.

A lot of SF fen are Ask types, for whatever reason, and the idea of Green/Red buttons to signify "I am open to propositions [of whatever kind is under discussion]" versus "Do not even ask, because at best we will be uncomfortable and at worst I will shoot you down and call con Security"... It's really, really engaging to extreme Ask types. It's a clear yes/no signal, it saves time, it saves trying to figure out weird (to them) Hint rules... I totally see why the idea of badges showed up, and why a bunch of Asks would say, "Hey! There are some of us who like this, and who see this as a positive thing! We should make an easy way for people to participate if they want, and be left alone if they want!"

Of course, the thing about Ask types -- especially extreme ones -- is that they are not necessarily so good at the communication of the nuances, y'know? Nuances are a Hint thing. And everyone forgets to "unpack" their logic at least some of the time. The combination, when trying to show off this Really Cool Idea that We Had Fun With? *wince*

So, yeah, I wish he'd thought it through more clearly, too! I'm just willing to give him the benefit of the doubt in the sense of good intentions vs. "I wanna fondle teh boobies, and I think you're stupid enough to buy this excuse."

Mind, I do In Nomine stuff. I know where good intentions lead...

(Boys get the other end of it -- "be like THIS or OMG TEH GAAAAAAY." Friend of mine has two boys, who are sweethearts (and one is HAWT!), and from what she tells me? Boys who are genuinely nice, kind, and sincere can get the fuzzy end of the lollipop in life as well. It's just a different kind, and ironically less obvious.

...can we stage a coup and establish Beth's Ideal Utopia? I promise to give all my friends and followers great titles and wonderful hats.)
[identity profile] naanima.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 04:38 am (UTC)
See, I fall under the 'Ask' school of thought; I absolutely hate pussy footing around issues. Hinting drives me up the wall because it is a complete waste of time on the parts of everyone involved. However, I do know when not to say anything, which seem to be lacking at times with many people.

I understand the lack of socials skills in people, I know lots of male engineers and computer science geeks, and while I dearly care about them I do find them to be completely idiots at times when it comes to attitudes and behaviour in social settings. I do try and give most guys the benefits of the doubt.

However, my main issue with the whole thing was that it is wholly targeted at women. At no point does he even entertain the thought of wearing a badge that says 'You may touch my dick', and when someone did raise the point in his comments his answer was along the lines of 'but people would think me weird', and my reaction is 'and you think people will think chicks will be perceived less weirdly?'. It makes me froth at the mouth that he didn’t seem to see a problem of only women wearing the badges.

Just yeah.


(There seem to be less of a problem here in Australia, or maybe I just hang out with the right people. Don’t get me wrong we have sexist dicks, but generally speaking most of my male friends are nice and understanding. I mean when they hang around with other guy friends they tend to degenerate into 12-yr-olds and talk shit, but honestly it isn’t like we women don’t talk shit about hot men. Gods, most of the fanfiction I read is all about the sexualisation of men. So I don’t have a problem with that, and it isn’t as if they don’t respect women, if something they say piss me off I tell them, and even if it doesn’t sink in 9 out of 10 they won’t say it again, at least in my presence.

I would love to stage a coup. To be sure, I’m more interested in shoes and stockings, but I love hats too!)

Profile

naanima: (Default)
[personal profile] naanima
witty, somehow

Latest Month

October 2009
S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Designed by [personal profile] chasethestars